top of page
Diaz Anselmo & Associates

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FURTHER AMENDS PROCEDURAL RULE 1.280 TO PREVENT BAD FAITH DELAYS IN DISCOVERY

  • Writer: Nazish Zaheer Shah
    Nazish Zaheer Shah
  • Jul 11
  • 2 min read

Updated: Aug 1

In an opinion issued on June 19, 2025, the Florida Supreme Court further amended rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure to stop a growing trend wherein parties were refusing to respond to discovery requests claiming their opponent had not “satisfied” initial disclosure obligations under rule 1.280(f). In re Amendments to Fla. Rule of Civil Proc. 1.280(f), 50 Fla. L. Weekly S136 (Fla. June 19, 2025).


To provide some context, in December 2024 the Florida Supreme Court added the following language to procedural rule 1.280: "A party may not seek discovery from any source before that party's initial disclosure obligations are satisfied, except when authorized by stipulation or by court order."  Once the rule took effect, some litigants refused to respond to discovery requests claiming initial disclosures made by their opponent were "incomplete or inadequate” and therefore failed to satisfy the initial disclosure obligation.[i]


Noting that inadequacies with initial disclosures were already addressed in subsection (d) of rule 1.280, the Court amended subsection (f) to read as follows: “A party may not seek discovery from any source before that party’s initial disclosures are served on the other party, except when authorized by stipulation or by court order.” Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(f). The Court’s prompt reaction and modification to rule 1.280(f) should prevent bad faith delays and get discovery back on track.


In a hurry? Click here for a summary.


On June 19, 2025, the Florida Supreme Court further amended rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure to stop a growing trend wherein parties were refusing to respond to discovery requests claiming an opponent’s initial disclosures were “incomplete or inadequate” and did not “satisfy” initial disclosure obligations under rule 1.280(f). In re Amendments to Fla. Rule of Civil Proc. 1.280(f), 50 Fla. L. Weekly S136 (Fla. June 19, 2025). This recent amendment eliminated the requirement that a party “satisfy” initial disclosures requiring only that a party “serve” initial disclosures.

 


[i] In re Amendments to Fla. Rule of Civil Proc. 1.280(f), 50 Fla. L. Weekly S136, *2 (Fla. June 19, 2025).




Diaz | Anselmo Attorneys at Law

`


Headquarters:

499 NW 70th Avenue, Suite 309 

Plantation, FL 33317


Fax: 954-564-9252







 
 

Headquarters:

499 NW 70th Avenue, Suite 309 

Plantation, FL 33317

Main: 954-564-0071

Fax: 954-564-9252

Mailing Address:

PO Box 19519

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33318
 

Main: 954-564-0071
Fax: 954-564-9252

Diaz Anselmo & Associates P.A.

Indiana

9465 Counselors Row, Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46240

Kentucky
50 East River Center Blvd., Suite 412
Covington, Kentucky 41011​

Ohio
400 Techne Center Drive, Suite 220 Milford, OH 45150

Wisconsin
342 N. Water Street, Suite 600
Milwaukee, WI 53202

Illinois
1771 West Diehl Road, Suite 120
Naperville, IL 60563


Main: 630-453-6960
Fax: 630-428-4620


Real Estate Main: 630-453-6800
Real Estate Fax: 630-428-4640

Website: diazanselmo.com

© 2025 Diaz | Anselmo Attorneys At Law

Crafted By: Finfrock Marketing

bottom of page