top of page
Diaz Anselmo & Associates

DISMISSAL OF DEBTOR’S CLASS ACTION SUIT | KEY POINTS

  • Writer: diazanselmo
    diazanselmo
  • Jun 28, 2023
  • 2 min read

Updated: Mar 21

  1. Earlier this month the Seventh Circuit expanded its typically limited interpretation of what satisfies the injury in fact requirement for purposes of determining whether a party has standing to sue under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act[i] (“FDCPA”). Mack v. Resurgent Cap. Servs., L.P., No. 21-2792, 2023 WL 3861896 (7th Cir. June 7, 2023). Mack sued the owner and servicer of her credit card due to confusion caused by a dunning letter. Among other things, the dunning letter indicated Mack’s credit card balance was $7,179.87 and that her account was sold to LVNV. She did not recognize the company that authored the letter.

  2. As instructed by the dunning letter, Mack disputed the validity of the debt by sending a written request for verification to the collection agency that sent the letter. Instead of providing validation of the debt, the servicer responded it was investigating the inquiry. The confusion arose by the inclusion again of a paragraph which indicated the debt would be considered valid unless Mack disputed the debt in writing. To preserve her rights, Mack sent a second validation request, this time to LVNV’s servicer, thereby incurring $3.95 in mailing costs. Mack never received validation of the debt so she sued the current owner of the credit card account and its servicer for violations of the FDCPA.

  3. The district court dismissed her case finding Mack lacked Article III standing because she failed to allege an injury in fact. The Seventh Circuit reversed finding Mack’s payment of $3.95 for postage to send the second validation letter was a concrete injury which affected Mack “in a personal and individual way” because she expended her own money, time and effort to send the second validation request. The Court held the modest amount of the damages was irrelevant to the injury in fact analysis. The district court was ordered to reinstate the class action suit so the matter could be adjudicated on its merits.

 
 

Headquarters:

499 NW 70th Avenue, Suite 309 

Plantation, FL 33317

Main: 954-564-0071

Fax: 954-564-9252

Mailing Address:

PO Box 19519

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33318
 

Main: 954-564-0071
Fax: 954-564-9252

Diaz Anselmo & Associates P.A.

Indiana

9465 Counselors Row, Suite 200
Indianapolis, IN 46240

Kentucky
50 East River Center Blvd., Suite 412
Covington, Kentucky 41011​

Ohio
400 Techne Center Drive, Suite 111
Milford, OH 45150

Wisconsin
342 N. Water Street, Suite 600
Milwaukee, WI 53202

Illinois
1771 West Diehl Road, Suite 120
Naperville, IL 60563


Main: 630-453-6960
Fax: 630-428-4620


Real Estate Main: 630-453-6800
Real Estate Fax: 630-428-4640

Website: diazanselmo.com

© 2025 Diaz | Anselmo Attorneys At Law

Crafted By: Finfrock Marketing

bottom of page